Path: EDN Asia >> Design Centre >> IC/Board/Systems Design >> Employ analog behavioral models for mixed-signal SOC verification
IC/Board/Systems Design Share print

Employ analog behavioral models for mixed-signal SOC verification

30 Aug 2012  | Qi Wang

Share this page with your friends

The era of "Internet everywhere" is paving way for a spectrum of applications targeted toward low-power and mixed-signal design, in segments ranging from health care to automotive to communications. Meanwhile, design challenges such as intellectual-property selection and integration as well as SOC- and system-level verification are spawning a whole new class of problems for EDA tools.

Mixed-signal design engineers face increasing difficulties in design and verification of complex mixed-signal SOCs. In a survey of mixed-signal design engineers during the 2011 Mixed-Signal Tech on Tour, a worldwide series presented by Cadence Design Systems Inc., the 561 respondents identified mixed-signal verification as a top customer challenge.

The performance of Spice simulation is prominent in the difficulties being reported (figure 1). Analog Spice and Fast-Spice simulators are orders of magnitude slower than digital simulators and are slower still when compared with emulators and hardware accelerators. A June 2011 Design Automation Conference panel discussed the need for analog design and verification to become more like digital—that is, to become more structured and more top-down (reference 1). Verification planning tools are required, and debug methodologies such as ABV (assertion-based verification), MDV (metric-driven verification), and UVM (universal verification methodology)-like self-checking test benches must be created for analog/mixed-signal.

To tackle simulation-throughput issues, designers are turning to behavioral-modeling techniques, which can increase simulation speed. Such techniques include event-driven simulation based on Verilog-A, Verilog-AMS, and RNM (real-number modeling).

Analog behavioral models are typically written in Verilog-AMS, Verilog-A, VHDL-AMS, or SystemVerilog.

Verilog-A is a pure-analog subset of Verilog-AMS and is mainly used for detailed analog models for performance verification. The language is quite simple, but it is challenging to write a good behavioral model with Verilog-A that provides significant performance gains while retaining the right level of accuracy. The advantage of Verilog-A is the ability to use models in pure-analog simulations as well as in the mixed-signal environment. The models are too low-level, however, to enable efficient SOC-level verification of mixed-signal designs.

The RNM technique models electrical signals by representing them as real values. Provided that the modules are at a sufficiently high level of abstraction, the interfaces can be described by passing real numbers between blocks to represent the voltage, or current, signal being transferred. This is a powerful way to simulate complex systems rapidly. Traditionally, iterating to a solution involving feedback would require an analog solver.

RNM is available in the Verilog-AMS, SystemVerilog, and VHDL-AMS languages. A commonly used RNM approach is the wreal data type in Verilog-AMS. RNM uses a discrete event solver—without an analog solver—and can be used to simulate mixed-signal systems at incredible speeds. It is primarily limited to modeling at a high enough level of abstraction that bidirectional analog interactions between blocks are not significant. In other words, typical RNM defines blocks in terms of input/output transfer characteristics, with no strong direct feedback present among the blocks. Logic can be modeled naturally in these languages, so RNM is also a good choice for systems with only a small amount of analog content.

Top-down or bottom-up
Designers use two principal methodologies based on the creation of behavioral models for mixed-signal design. In a top-down methodology, models are developed before the circuits are designed. The behavioral models can be simpler ones that are sufficient for functional verification at the system level. In a bottom-up methodology, the models are written to match an already implemented block for performance verification and usually result in a more accurate but slower-running model.

1 • 2 • 3 Next Page Last Page


Want to more of this to be delivered to you for FREE?

Subscribe to EDN Asia alerts and receive the latest design ideas and product news in your inbox.

Got to make sure you're not a robot. Please enter the code displayed on the right.

Time to activate your subscription - it's easy!

We have sent an activate request to your registerd e-email. Simply click on the link to activate your subscription.

We're doing this to protect your privacy and ensure you successfully receive your e-mail alerts.


Add New Comment
Visitor (To avoid code verification, simply login or register with us. It is fast and free!)
*Verify code:
Tech Impact

Regional Roundup
What you need to know about the new Fujitsu-Panasonic Co.
The semiconductor production business is no longer a sacred cow either. Fujitsu and Panasonic have jettisoned most of their own fabs over the last few years.

ST launches MEMS lab in Taiwan
Private cloud bolsters chip design research, education


News | Products | Design Features | Regional Roundup | Tech Impact