Resistance measurement: Two-wire vs. four-wire10 Apr 2013 | Jerry Janesch
Share this page with your friends
The main measurement issue with the two-wire method, as applied to low resistance measurements, is that the total lead resistance (RLEAD) is added to the measurement. Because the test current (I) causes a small but significant voltage drop across the lead resistances, the voltage (VM) measured by the meter won't be exactly the same as the voltage (VR) directly across the test resistance (R), and considerable error can result. Typical lead resistances range from 10mΩ to 1Ω, so it's very difficult to obtain accurate two-wire resistance measurements when the resistance under test is lower than 100Ω because the resistance of interest will be completely swamped by the lead resistance. In fact, lead resistance will be the dominant source of error. For example, using test leads with a 100mΩ combined resistance to perform a two-wire resistance measurement on a 500mΩ resistor will result in a 20% measurement error in addition to that of the instrument.
Figure 3: Four-wire resistance measurement configuration.
Four-wire (Kelvin) resistance measurements
Due to the limitations of the two-wire method, a different approach is used for low resistance measurements that reduce the effect of test lead resistance. For measuring DUTs with resistances equal to or less than 1kΩ, test engineers may use the four-wire (Kelvin) connection shown in figure 3. Because the voltage is measured at the DUT, voltage drop in the test leads is eliminated (this voltage could be significant when measuring low-resistance devices).
With this configuration, the test current (I) is forced through the test resistance (R) via one set of test leads, while the voltage (VM) across the DUT is measured through a second set of leads (sense leads).
Although some small current (typically less than 100pA) may flow through the sense leads, it is usually negligible and can generally be ignored for all practical purposes. Therefore the voltage measured by the meter (VM) is essentially the same as the voltage (VR) across the resistance (R).
As a result, the resistance value can be determined much more accurately than with the two-wire method. Note that the voltage-sensing leads should be connected as close to the resistor under test as possible to avoid including part of the resistance of the test leads in the measurement.
About the author
Jerry Janesch is a senior market development manager at Keithley Instruments, Inc., headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio, which is part of the Tektronix test and measurement portfolio. He earned a bachelor's degree in electrical engineering from Fenn College of Engineering and a master's of business administration from John Carroll University. He has been with Keithley since 2000.
To download the PDF version of this article, click here.
Want to more of this to be delivered to you for FREE?
Subscribe to EDN Asia alerts and receive the latest design ideas and product news in your inbox.
Got to make sure you're not a robot. Please enter the code displayed on the right.Please enter the valid code. Sorry, you have reached the maximum number of requests allowed. You may wish to try again after a few hours.
Time to activate your subscription - it's easy!
We have sent an activate request to your registerd e-email. Simply click on the link to activate your subscription.
We're doing this to protect your privacy and ensure you successfully receive your e-mail alerts.
Scientists ride high on cannabis as ideal supercapacitor
Scientists had long suspected there was more value to the hemp bast, a cousin of marijuana; it was just a matter of finding the right way to process the material.
The semiconductor production business is no longer a sacred cow either. Fujitsu and Panasonic have jettisoned most of their own fabs over the last few years.