Solving PCB switching noise with simple layout rules

Article By : Bonnie Baker

Find, quantify, and remove potential PCB capacitances that lead to signal integrity issues caused by switching noise with a few design techniques.

It’s been a while, but I still visit the fundamentals of PCB design and troubleshooting. It is very effortless to generate unwanted signals that suddenly dance across the board. This acquired noise boils down to the fundamentals of building a capacitor. That’s right. You don’t have to purchase and spend extra money on these unwanted, parasitic parts. You simply put two traces or metallic items close to one another, and presto, you have generated a possible extrinsic or external circuit noise.

Signal coupling problems occur when a PCB trace with high impedance termination is next to a trace with fast-changing voltages such as a digital or clock signal. It only takes two traces to build this easy-to-construct PCB capacitance. And the cause of this noise is high-speed signals such as digital level shifts with a fast change in voltage over time (¶V/¶t) and a high impedance trace.

Figure 1 diagrams two PCB traces; 0.003 mm or “d” is the distance between the traces and “L” is the adjoining length.

Figure 1 Use PCB trace thickness (w), distance (d), and length (L) dimensions to determine the capacitance between two traces. Source: Texas Instruments

The dielectric constant of air (eo) and dielectric constant of er—which depends on the glass weave style, thickness, resin content, and copper foil roughness of the substrate coating around the traces—complete the final formula for your new capacitor.

A case of this type of PCB capacitor is shown below as Example 1:

L = 1 inch or 25.4 mm

d = 0.2 mm

w = 0.003 mm

eo = 8.85 x 10-12 F/m

er = 4.8 (FR4 PCB material)

The new capacitor is shown in Equation 1 below:This capacitance value seems small, but let’s look at the digital and analog signal consequences.

Extrinsic trace capacitance noise

When one trace has a digital clock signal, the signal couples over to other traces as a current instead of voltage. The critical clock characteristic is that the trace’s digital signal has a fast rise and fall time. Another condition is that the receiving trace has a high impedance termination such as the input to an amplifier in a buffer configuration (Figure 2).

Figure 2 If the rise and fall times on the voltage CLK trace has a fast change in voltage with time, a signal appears as current spikes on the second trace. A guard trace disrupts the e-field and attenuates the coupling phenomena. Source: Texas Instruments

The magnitude of the second trace’s current spike depends on the trace-to-trace capacitance and the second trace’s terminating resistance magnitude.

Taking Example 1 a step forward to Example 2:

RIN = 1013W (op amp input impedance)

C = 0.0162 x 10-12 Farads (PCB capacitance)

¶V/¶t = (3.3 x 0.8 V)/230 ps = 11. 5 x 109 V/sec (100-MHz clock)

The peak voltage at the output of the op amp is shown in Equation 2 below:

A 1.86 GV overdrive to the input of the op amp is overly significant. It looks like the circuit is dead-on-arrival. However, there are some design techniques that we can use to bring this circuit back to life.

How to bring circuit back to life

Let’s bring some oxygen back to this system. There are two strategies to try: increase the distance between the traces and add a grounded guard trace. A practical solution is to separate the traces from each other. Since the critical distance (d) between the traces is in the denominator of Equation 1, the capacitance will inversely decrease.

The second strategy is to place an additional grounded trace between the two original traces. If you place a guard trace between these two traces, there is a disruption to the e-field. Usually, there is enough disruption to attenuate the entire extrinsic noise effect.

It never hurts to dig back into the basics as you design your next PCB. This blog addresses the unintentional extrinsic noise from neighboring PCB traces. Pull out your pencil and paper and quantify the potential noise sources.

This article was originally published on Planet Analog.

Bonnie Baker is a seasoned analog, mixed-signal, and signal chain professional and electronics engineer. Baker has published and authored hundreds of technical articles and blogs in industry publications. She is also the author of the book “A Baker’s Dozen: Real Analog Solutions for Digital Designers” as well as coauthor of several other books.


Leave a comment